It is probably not a surprise that Jeremy Duns and his little club of right-wing thriller writers have accused me of being a man.
Duns has stated clearly that I am Steve Roach.
I guess in his public school/spy circles, a women's place is in the
kitchen, or the bedroom. It obviously has not occured to him that a mere
women might be capable of having a debate, and even questioning a man
on points of principle.
There is something very creepy about the attacks you have made on me. I
have raised a legitimate issue about whether it was ethical or legal to
record a telephone conversation with Steve Roach without asking his
permission. You are perfectly entitled to argue that it is. I disagree.
But it should be possible to have a civilised debate about that without
stooping to personal abuse.
You - and your supporters - have threatened me with legal action, and
you have yourself stated that you have been making enquiries about where
I live. Surely you can understand that for a group of men who boast
about their connections to the security services to demand the address
of a women is in itself designed to be intimidating.
Your follower - Mr Cartright - refers to me as 'Leather's bitch'?
Do you condone that kind of language?
Are you in fact Mr Cartright and is that how you normally refer to women?
Violence against women - like unauthorised surveillance - is a serious problem in our society.
I refer you to this website - which has many of the relevant statistics.
A staggering 43% of young women in London (aged 18-34) experienced sexual harassment in public spaces over the last year.
One in 10 women has been raped, and more than a third subjected to sexual assault according to this research.
It seems to me that insisting that a women is a man when she raises a
serious issue and then calling her a 'bitch' (a man's bitch at that) is
directly creating a culture in which that happens.
There are serious, important issue, and you should answer them.